<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Never Get Involved in a Land War in Asia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seefirstblog.com/2010/03/02/never-get-involved-in-a-land-war-in-asia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seefirstblog.com/2010/03/02/never-get-involved-in-a-land-war-in-asia/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=never-get-involved-in-a-land-war-in-asia</link>
	<description>Insights into the uncertain world of healthcare</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 22:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Falchuk</title>
		<link>http://www.seefirstblog.com/2010/03/02/never-get-involved-in-a-land-war-in-asia/comment-page-1/#comment-758</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Falchuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seefirstblog.com/?p=1986#comment-758</guid>
		<description>Hi IBE,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, he was asked would you scrap it and he said yes.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But it doesn&#039;t really matter how Ezra Klein or anyone else wants to parse his words. His point that American health care isn&#039;t focused on costs is simply untrue, and reflects the deeper problems with the whole reform process.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is all very complicated and the Businessweek piece you link to is very good, thanks for sharing that!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Evan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi IBE,</p>
<p>Well, he was asked would you scrap it and he said yes.  </p>
<p>But it doesn&#39;t really matter how Ezra Klein or anyone else wants to parse his words. His point that American health care isn&#39;t focused on costs is simply untrue, and reflects the deeper problems with the whole reform process.</p>
<p>It is all very complicated and the Businessweek piece you link to is very good, thanks for sharing that!</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Evan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inchoate but earnest</title>
		<link>http://www.seefirstblog.com/2010/03/02/never-get-involved-in-a-land-war-in-asia/comment-page-1/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>inchoate but earnest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seefirstblog.com/?p=1986#comment-743</guid>
		<description>Evan,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice, thoughtful post, marred only by your assertion that Buffett would have Obama &quot;scrap the whole thing and start over&quot;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Uhhhh, no.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See &lt;a href=&quot;http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/03/warren_buffett_i_would_vote_fo.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ezra Klein&#039;s recap of Buffett&#039;s recent CNBC interview&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt; &quot;If it was a choice today between plan A, which is what we&#039;ve got, or plan B, the Senate bill, &lt;em&gt;I would vote for the Senate bill.&lt;/em&gt; But I would much rather see a plan C that really attacks costs.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;. (my emphasis).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s hardly the same thing as saying, without qualification, &quot;scrap the whole thing &amp; start over&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_11/b4170072396095.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Clay Christensen&#039;s recent Businessweek article&lt;/a&gt;, which shares your &quot;the challenge of health care costs is amplified by health care&#039;s silos&quot;  theme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evan,</p>
<p>Nice, thoughtful post, marred only by your assertion that Buffett would have Obama &#8220;scrap the whole thing and start over&#8221;. </p>
<p>Uhhhh, no.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/03/warren_buffett_i_would_vote_fo.html" rel="nofollow">Ezra Klein&#39;s recap of Buffett&#39;s recent CNBC interview</a>:<br />
<blockquote> &#8220;If it was a choice today between plan A, which is what we&#39;ve got, or plan B, the Senate bill, <em>I would vote for the Senate bill.</em> But I would much rather see a plan C that really attacks costs.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>. (my emphasis).</p>
<p>That&#39;s hardly the same thing as saying, without qualification, &#8220;scrap the whole thing &#038; start over&#8221;.</p>
<p>Also, see <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_11/b4170072396095.htm" rel="nofollow">Clay Christensen&#39;s recent Businessweek article</a>, which shares your &#8220;the challenge of health care costs is amplified by health care&#39;s silos&#8221;  theme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prostate Cancer Screening: Are we supposed to be screened or not? &#171; See First Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.seefirstblog.com/2010/03/02/never-get-involved-in-a-land-war-in-asia/comment-page-1/#comment-740</link>
		<dc:creator>Prostate Cancer Screening: Are we supposed to be screened or not? &#171; See First Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seefirstblog.com/?p=1986#comment-740</guid>
		<description>[...] about this until they are 50.  It&#8217;s all very confusing.  And when you listen to people like Warren Buffet saying we need to declare a &#8220;national emergency&#8221; to control health care spending, you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about this until they are 50.  It&#8217;s all very confusing.  And when you listen to people like Warren Buffet saying we need to declare a &#8220;national emergency&#8221; to control health care spending, you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

