<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Doctors: Beware of Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seefirstblog.com/2009/10/07/doctors-beware-of-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seefirstblog.com/2009/10/07/doctors-beware-of-politics/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=doctors-beware-of-politics</link>
	<description>Insights into the uncertain world of healthcare</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 22:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Go On A Doc Fix - Better Health</title>
		<link>http://www.seefirstblog.com/2009/10/07/doctors-beware-of-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-1209</link>
		<dc:creator>No Go On A Doc Fix - Better Health</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seefirstblog.com/?p=1418#comment-1209</guid>
		<description>[...] that getting involved in politics working out for you guys? Not so [...]

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment&#039;s actual post text did not contain your blog url (http://www.seefirstblog.com/2009/10/07/doctors-beware-of-politics) and so is spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that getting involved in politics working out for you guys? Not so [...]</p>
<p>[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment&#8217;s actual post text did not contain your blog url (<a href="http://www.seefirstblog.com/2009/10/07/doctors-beware-of-politics" rel="nofollow">http://www.seefirstblog.com/2009/10/07/doctors-beware-of-politics</a>) and so is spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 5 Most-Read Posts for October &#171; See First Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.seefirstblog.com/2009/10/07/doctors-beware-of-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 5 Most-Read Posts for October &#171; See First Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seefirstblog.com/?p=1418#comment-484</guid>
		<description>[...] 4.  Doctors: Beware of Politics [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4.  Doctors: Beware of Politics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Roundup &#171; See First Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.seefirstblog.com/2009/10/07/doctors-beware-of-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Roundup &#171; See First Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seefirstblog.com/?p=1418#comment-431</guid>
		<description>[...] of twitter buzz over the weekend on my post Doctors: Beware of Politics.  Check out the insightful [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of twitter buzz over the weekend on my post Doctors: Beware of Politics.  Check out the insightful [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Falchuk</title>
		<link>http://www.seefirstblog.com/2009/10/07/doctors-beware-of-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Falchuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seefirstblog.com/?p=1418#comment-650</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the terrific comments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t mean to suggest doctors shouldn&#039;t engage in the process of reform.  I&#039;ve been saying very much the opposite for a long time including in this post.  They have a central role to play, especially in getting us re-focused on the really important issues of patient care.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The trouble is it is awfully easy to wreck your trusted, independent image if you start taking political positions along the way.  It&#039;s a difficult balance to strike.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As Mackey and Guest show us, the lure of politics is hard to resist.  Who wouldn&#039;t want to have an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, or to be on TV discussing your opinion on a hot topic?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But as they also show, the consequences can be much more than you expect.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a wise man once said, what does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the terrific comments.</p>
<p>I don&#39;t mean to suggest doctors shouldn&#39;t engage in the process of reform.  I&#39;ve been saying very much the opposite for a long time including in this post.  They have a central role to play, especially in getting us re-focused on the really important issues of patient care.</p>
<p>The trouble is it is awfully easy to wreck your trusted, independent image if you start taking political positions along the way.  It&#39;s a difficult balance to strike.  </p>
<p>As Mackey and Guest show us, the lure of politics is hard to resist.  Who wouldn&#39;t want to have an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, or to be on TV discussing your opinion on a hot topic?  </p>
<p>But as they also show, the consequences can be much more than you expect.  </p>
<p>As a wise man once said, what does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Falchuk</title>
		<link>http://www.seefirstblog.com/2009/10/07/doctors-beware-of-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Falchuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seefirstblog.com/?p=1418#comment-425</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the terrific comments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t mean to suggest doctors shouldn&#039;t engage in the process of reform.  I&#039;ve been saying very much the opposite for a long time including in this post.  They have a central role to play, especially in getting us re-focused on the really important issues of patient care.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The trouble is it is awfully easy to wreck your trusted, independent image if you start taking political positions along the way.  It&#039;s a difficult balance to strike.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As Mackey and Guest show us, the lure of politics is hard to resist.  Who wouldn&#039;t want to have an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, or to be on TV discussing your opinion on a hot topic?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But as they also show, the consequences can be much more than you expect.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a wise man once said, what does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the terrific comments.</p>
<p>I don&#39;t mean to suggest doctors shouldn&#39;t engage in the process of reform.  I&#39;ve been saying very much the opposite for a long time including in this post.  They have a central role to play, especially in getting us re-focused on the really important issues of patient care.</p>
<p>The trouble is it is awfully easy to wreck your trusted, independent image if you start taking political positions along the way.  It&#39;s a difficult balance to strike.  </p>
<p>As Mackey and Guest show us, the lure of politics is hard to resist.  Who wouldn&#39;t want to have an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, or to be on TV discussing your opinion on a hot topic?  </p>
<p>But as they also show, the consequences can be much more than you expect.  </p>
<p>As a wise man once said, what does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKirschMD</title>
		<link>http://www.seefirstblog.com/2009/10/07/doctors-beware-of-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>MKirschMD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seefirstblog.com/?p=1418#comment-424</guid>
		<description>Yes, I saw the photo-op of the 150 white-coated docs at the Rose Garden Party.  The coats were so starched and stiff, that I wondered if these were cardboard cutouts or actual humans.  These political props should have been in their offices or on hospital wards taking care of sick folks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obviously, politics permeates health care and physicians are not immune.  True, we are not economists or policy wonks, but we do have a unique vantage point of health care. While some of our carping is political, we are very conscious on preserving and expanding high quality health care.  I think that physicians’ voices should be sought and heard.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I thank you for your gracious and exaggerated comment that we are ‘the most trusted profession’, but I doubt this is still true.  I think this designation belongs to senators and congressmen.  See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.MDWhistleblower.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.MDWhistleblower.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt; for physician views on health care and medical quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I saw the photo-op of the 150 white-coated docs at the Rose Garden Party.  The coats were so starched and stiff, that I wondered if these were cardboard cutouts or actual humans.  These political props should have been in their offices or on hospital wards taking care of sick folks.</p>
<p>Obviously, politics permeates health care and physicians are not immune.  True, we are not economists or policy wonks, but we do have a unique vantage point of health care. While some of our carping is political, we are very conscious on preserving and expanding high quality health care.  I think that physicians’ voices should be sought and heard.</p>
<p>I thank you for your gracious and exaggerated comment that we are ‘the most trusted profession’, but I doubt this is still true.  I think this designation belongs to senators and congressmen.  See <a href="http://www.MDWhistleblower.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.MDWhistleblower.blogspot.com</a> for physician views on health care and medical quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marya Zilberberg</title>
		<link>http://www.seefirstblog.com/2009/10/07/doctors-beware-of-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Marya Zilberberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seefirstblog.com/?p=1418#comment-422</guid>
		<description>Hi, Evan,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A great and thoughtful post! I have to disagree with you on a couple of points. First, the fact that &quot;healthcare reform has become a deeply political subject&quot; does not indeed make it a deeply political subject. Healthcare reform is everyone&#039;s issue, despite what the Washington spin cycle i trying to do to it. Although we can argue about some of the details of all of the proposals, there is no moral relativism in needing to provide all our citizens with affordable accessible quality care. So, this is exactly the kind of issue in my opinion that doctors should be weighing in on, and, yes, as doctors and not just another noise-making group.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, on to the &quot;most trusted profession&quot;. Despite the poll you point to (incidentally, the poll reflected the time, 2006, when most Americans did not even trust the President to tell the truth), it is like saying that the US has the best healthcare in the world. Given the magnitude of errors, healthcare-associated complications and other heretofore unquantified harms, this trust, if it exists, may not be justified across the board.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, I do strongly agree with you that the debate has been derailed by political interests and needs to be brought back to what is important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Evan,</p>
<p>A great and thoughtful post! I have to disagree with you on a couple of points. First, the fact that &#8220;healthcare reform has become a deeply political subject&#8221; does not indeed make it a deeply political subject. Healthcare reform is everyone&#39;s issue, despite what the Washington spin cycle i trying to do to it. Although we can argue about some of the details of all of the proposals, there is no moral relativism in needing to provide all our citizens with affordable accessible quality care. So, this is exactly the kind of issue in my opinion that doctors should be weighing in on, and, yes, as doctors and not just another noise-making group.</p>
<p>Now, on to the &#8220;most trusted profession&#8221;. Despite the poll you point to (incidentally, the poll reflected the time, 2006, when most Americans did not even trust the President to tell the truth), it is like saying that the US has the best healthcare in the world. Given the magnitude of errors, healthcare-associated complications and other heretofore unquantified harms, this trust, if it exists, may not be justified across the board.</p>
<p>Finally, I do strongly agree with you that the debate has been derailed by political interests and needs to be brought back to what is important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Falchuk</title>
		<link>http://www.seefirstblog.com/2009/10/07/doctors-beware-of-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Falchuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seefirstblog.com/?p=1418#comment-421</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks very much for your thoughtful comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like your &quot;Me and My Doctor, We Know Best&quot; campaign, detailed at that second link.  It emphasizes the importance of the doctor-patient relationship, and the central role it ought to play in our system.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Steve, thanks again for your comment, I hope to hear more of your insights in the future.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Evan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve,</p>
<p>Thanks very much for your thoughtful comment.</p>
<p>I like your &#8220;Me and My Doctor, We Know Best&#8221; campaign, detailed at that second link.  It emphasizes the importance of the doctor-patient relationship, and the central role it ought to play in our system.  </p>
<p>Steve, thanks again for your comment, I hope to hear more of your insights in the future.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Evan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Medical Assoc.</title>
		<link>http://www.seefirstblog.com/2009/10/07/doctors-beware-of-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Medical Assoc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seefirstblog.com/?p=1418#comment-420</guid>
		<description>Evan: I liked your column well enough to retweet it, but have to take issue with your conclusion that physicians should stay out of politics. Many of our members would agree with you, that politics and the legislative process are too dirty. Our response is to point to the third point in the American Medical Association&#039;s Principles of Medical Ethics: &quot;A physician shall respect the law and also recognize a responsibility to seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient.&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/y9mze2e&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/y9mze2e&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do agree that physicians should focus on what&#039;s really necessary in health care reform. That&#039;s why TMA has started the &quot;Fix What&#039;s Wrong, Keep What&#039;s Good&quot; campaign. I encourage your readers to join us. &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/yewmhec&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/yewmhec&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Steve Levine&lt;br&gt;VP, Communication&lt;br&gt;Texas Medical Association</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evan: I liked your column well enough to retweet it, but have to take issue with your conclusion that physicians should stay out of politics. Many of our members would agree with you, that politics and the legislative process are too dirty. Our response is to point to the third point in the American Medical Association&#39;s Principles of Medical Ethics: &#8220;A physician shall respect the law and also recognize a responsibility to seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient.&#8221; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/y9mze2e" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/y9mze2e</a></p>
<p>I do agree that physicians should focus on what&#39;s really necessary in health care reform. That&#39;s why TMA has started the &#8220;Fix What&#39;s Wrong, Keep What&#39;s Good&#8221; campaign. I encourage your readers to join us. <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yewmhec" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yewmhec</a></p>
<p>Steve Levine<br />VP, Communication<br />Texas Medical Association</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

