Why is Health Insurance So Expensive?

By Evan Falchuk

Gary Schwitzer links to a Business Week article that says health insurance is a very uncompetitive market.  Schwitzer notes this hasn’t gotten much attention, and wonders if it is a reason why health insurance premiums keep going up.

It is – and it isn’t.  As with most things in health care, there’s more to it than it seems.

Business Week and Schwitzer are right that the market for health insurance is not especially competitive.  Most states have one or two dominant health insurers, and a number of other much smaller players.  The smaller insurers are often a big disadvantage.  I blogged about this a couple of months ago.

But the question of the cost of health insurance is something that mostly affects small employers – the companies that employ some 55 million Americans.

As companies get bigger, they minimize their exposure to the insurance market.  Mid-sized employers (between about 500 and 2,500 employees) buy so-called “stop loss” coverage.  Under these plans, they self-insure for some of the risk, and buy coverage for unexpectedly high expenses.  It’s sort of like a high deductible plan, except it’s for the company.  That market is, in fact, highly competitive, and serves many of the 14 million Americans who work for companies of this size.

Really big companies – which employ 43 million Americans – don’t buy health insurance at all.  They hire a health plan to administer their expenses, but have completely opted out of the health insurance market.

So is the uncompetitive health insurance market driving health care premium increases?

It doesn’t help, but there here are three other things that we don’t talk enough about that are driving these increases:

1.  State coverage mandates. Each state requires that insurers who wish to sell there comply with a huge variety of coverage mandates.  In fact, there are nearly 2,000 mandates, some of which add significant costs to health insurance.  Adding new mandates is a regular activity of state governments, based on the political clout of patient groups, pharmaceutical companies and others.  State governments have had an important role to play in driving premium increases.

2.  Guarantee issue requirements. The other thing some states have done is outlaw medical underwriting.  This means that if an uninsured person gets diagnosed with an illness, he can just go out and buy an insurance policy and, for the cost of an annual premium, get all the care he needs.  He can even cancel the policy after he’s done being treated, and buy one again if he gets sick again.  There may be valid public policy reasons to make health insurance guarantee-issue.  But the reality is that insurers have to add in additional premium to account for the fact that their risk pool includes in it much more costly individuals than otherwise would.  There is no free lunch.

3.  Other cost-shifting.  Studies show that tens of billions of dollars a year of uncompensated health care to the uninsured is provided by medical providers.  They try to offset these costs by negotiating higher payment rates from private insurers.  The same is true for government-funded programs.  As these programs have attempted to control costs by simply paying less, providers have tried to recoup those reductions through higher fees to health plans.  In each case, the ultimate cost is passed on to the consumer.  Some groups think this kind of cost-shifting adds 5-10% to annual premium rates.

There are, of course, lots of other reasons for the rapidly increasing health insurance rates.  These are few of the less discussed that we ought to talk about more.

  • Max Greenberg

    Regarding item #2 Guarantee issue requirements: It seems like we are moving towards a national database for all health records. If that occurs then someone with a just-discovered (or pre-existing) condition could not conceal that condition when trying to take out a “short-term” insurance policy to deal with that particular treatment. I am not in favor of any kind of national database, and also don’t feel people with pre-existing conditions should be excluded from new policies (I thought they already could – isn’t that what the certificate of insurability you get from your last employer is used for – to prove you are insurable, and exclude you from your new empoyer’s policy if you don’t have one.) If people can be excluded due to pre-existing conditions, the next step would be to use DNA testing etc to exclude people who are genetically subject to every disease under the sun that could cost the insurance company money down the road. Excluding any person legally in the country from health insurance for whatever reason heads us down the wrong road. I don’t trust the government to run a national health care program, one reason being that they will end up rationing healthcare on a strict cost-benefit basis, and have the power to deny without legal recourse.

  • http://greggshealthinsurancenews.blogspot.com/2009/07/healthcare-industry-lobbyists-want.html Gregg

    I agree that the blame can’t all be placed at the feet of the insurers, but I believe mandates are a good thing. If there weren’t mandates the insurers wouldn’t cover anything.They are in the business of profiting from their product (insurance policies). I think they should mandate away HMO and PPO networks, actually. As a broker for 10 years, I noticed that there’s a great deal of abuse going on among the doctors and hospitals, insurers, drug companies…its a parasitic mess.

  • http://twitter.com/efalchuk Evan Falchuk

    It is a mess, Gregg, isn’t it?

    I agree that in a world where there isn’t much competition, the only way to get a company to provide good benefits is to require it.

    But why isn’t an easier solution to this problem promoting real competition in the health insurance marketplace?

    As it is, for a small employer or individual, there are very, very few options in most states.

    Interesting idea about getting rid of networks. But how about just going after the many abuses you talk about?

    Evan

  • The Third Policeman

    Evan, let’s also talk about costs that have nothing at all to do with medicine and health; advertising, marketing, administrative costs, executive salaries, dividends. It’s easy to list 2,000 mandates and claim they make private health insurance expensive, yet you offer no quantification. Please pick any plan, calculate the costs for mandates, and then compensation for senior management, and then we can debate actual things, rather than slogans.

  • http://scriboergosum.org.uk James

    Could also be that a small group of people want to obtain massive amounts of profit.

  • Nick

    There are two things I just don’t understand.

    1. Why aren’t we questioning the utility of health insurance for run-of-the-mill expenses?

    Insurance should cover large, unexpected expenses. Doctor’s visits, preventive care, even some subscriptions, cost only a fraction of the health insurance premium. And they are very predictable, too.

    You get a cold, go to a doctor, pay $20 in copay, get a strep test; you get a bill for $275 for the consultation and $45 for the test; the insurance then cuts that down to the “negotiated” rates of $79.45 respectively $22.10; you pay 15% of the 79.45 and the insurance pays the rest of that; but you pay for the whole of the lab thing because it is in your deductible; but of course your out of pocket costs go out of you flexible spending account so you get that reimbursed, too.

    Am I the only one that finds this a ridiculous waste of time? Why not pay 30-50% less insurance and just pay the doctor $100 for the whole thing? All that “job growth” in the “health professions” are people pushing this junk around. That costs money, too.

    If the providers would just have one, transparent, realistic price structure for these services, this whole aggravation and waste of time would be avoided.

    Insurance could then cover major things (outpatient surgery and up) and would require much less administration.

    2. I just don’t see why everyone is so afraid of a government insurance plan.

    Right now you have not government, but corporate bureaucrats deciding whether you should or should not get medical care. They are not accountable to anyone but their shareholders. If your private insurance denies coverage, you have no recourse but to pay out of pocket.

    How is this better than the government doing the same? Nobody is talking about a nationalized health care system, only about a government health plan. Even if all private insurance goes out of business, you can still pay for your doctor’s or hospital’s services yourself, just like now.

  • Pingback: How do you value collectibles that were broken by a serviceman? | Armani Figurine

  • http://twitter.com/efalchuk Evan Falchuk

    In a survey on these nearly 2,000 mandates (http://bit.ly/ZQ3In) it was found that most of them, individually, add a very small amount of additional cost. But when you add them all up, they become a very significant portion of overall premium expense, and an important driver of how these companies run their businesses.

    And this is the point. Health insurers today are more like regulated utilities than competitive businesses.

    The industry can point to the existence of 1,300 insurers, but the reality is that a very small handful dominate the market.

    As I noted, there are many reasons why health insurance is so expensive. These are a few that we don’t talk about enough.

  • William

    Hi Evan,

    The question isn’t so much why premiums are high, but why they’re increasing so fast. Of these 2,000 mandates (which is only about 40 per state), how many have been passed recently? How recent are guarantee-issue requirements? If states were to stop adding mandates and guarantee-issue requirements, would the growth in premiums stop?

    It seems to me that you’re talking about phenonema that will cause a one-off increase in costs, but not ongoing inflation. Do you think that’s a fair characterization?

  • http://twitter.com/efalchuk Evan Falchuk

    Hi William, thanks for the thoughtful comment.

    Adding new mandates is an ongoing activity. Sure, they’re one-off when they happen, but they keep happening.

    If you take a look at that link I posted in the response above, you can see where the “gaps” are in mandates. A quick look and you can predict which ones will end up being filled over the next couple of years.

    For example, one of the most costly has been mental health parity – 47 states now have it, and many have adopted it in the last few years.

    There are valid reasons for many of these mandates, but we should recognize that every time we add one they add new costs into the system that need to be priced into insurance.

    As to your broader question, there are many reasons why health costs continue to grow so quickly. Among them are poor public health, increasing availability of new medicines and treatments that didn’t exist before, overuse, abuses in the system, and many, many others.

    So, if you mandate that an insurer cover something new, they are now not only exposed to the cost of that service as it exists at the time of the mandate, but also to the underlying inflation as to that coverage that will make it more expensive over time.

    I hope that answers what you were asking, thanks again for posting.

  • Pingback: A Piece of the Action « See First Blog

  • Pingback: Why Health Insurance is So Expensive, Continued « See First Blog

  • Pingback: Should Insurance be Regulated by the Feds or the States? « See First Blog

  • medicaresupplementinsurance

    You know, not all health insurance are expensive, just like this one http://www.medigap360.com, try to explore, you will see that there are lots of insurance companies that offers affordable health insurance.

  • Anonymous

    “Hi,
    Your post is great ,very informative and detailed about Health Insurance. I stumbled upon something similar that could help the people to plan their insurance according to their needs & budget

  • http://generalinsurancepolicy.blogspot.com/ General Insurance

    Thanks for your blog. You have been featured in the latest Bits of health Insurance carnival.

  • HartleyGulbrand

    Most people pay health insurance all their lives weather they use it or not. It doesn't seem fair to me that other people can get insured after they discovered they were ill, only by paying a year's premium. I'm not saying they shouldn't be treated but I can see how this policy can increase costs for regular contributors.
    __________
    Seguros de coches

  • http://www.beckerbenefi.com Gary C. Becker

    Considering 5-10% of your employees can account for 50% of your claims, is your company doing anything to mitigate this risk?

    Considering that 7% of adults are diabetic and an additional 26% are pre-diabetic, is your company doing anything to help at-risk employees improve their health?

    This group health captive program allows mid-sized employers to offer a partially self-funded health plan and enjoy the significant underwriting profit an insurance company earns.

    Proven tools, techniques, and incentives are put into place to help employees better manage their health.

    Current Healthcare State:

    * For many employers, the cost of health insurance continues to rise and is now the second largest expense item, trailing only payroll. The average annual cost per family is almost $13,000 per year.
    * This puts medium sized employers in a difficult position as they have very few product options and scarce information about the healthcare system. They often don't even know what claims they have or where their premium dollars go.
    * The lack of transparency inherent in the system prevents employers from taking control of the cost of health insurance. The only thing clear to them are the annual increases they experience each year.

    How The Becker Benefit Group Can Help:

    * Our Group Health Captive allows these medium sized employers to address these annual increases and access the alternative insurance techniques currently used by larger 1000+ employer companies.
    * Providing complete control over health insurance costs by offering transparency and the opportunity to reduce these costs, the Group Health Captive actually creates stability and helps to increase profits.
    * Our Group Health Captive encourages a healthier workplace and provides employees with a better quality of life, both at work and at home.

    How The Group Health Captive Works:

    * A group of employers form a Group Health Captive in an effort to reduce the cost of health insurance. It can be formed with a variety of employer groups such as:

    1. Existing Group Captives or Risk Retention Groups
    2. Existing Self-Insured Groups for Workers Compensation
    3. Clients of an Agency or Broker
    4. Trade Associations
    5. Franchisees
    6. Portfolio Companies of Private Equity Firms

    Key Features:

    * Provides access to the same tools, techniques, and risk reduction strategies offered by the largest of employers
    * Eliminates carrier profit
    * Minimizes state premium taxes
    * Offers ability to eliminate or modify state mandated benefits
    * Offers complete plan flexibility and transparency
    * Encourages working together with “like-minded” employers
    * All wellness, coaching, and EAP plan included
    * All monies not spent on claims are returned or retained by employer

    We anticipate an employer's savings of 13% in year one and 22% by year five.

    I am convinced that if your company has the financial wherewithal, this approach can make a lot more sense than fully insured health plans.

    Gary Becker
    Becker Benefit Group
    11000 Owings Mills Blvd
    Ste 6a
    Owings Mills, MD 21117
    (410) 902-8800
    http://www.beckerbenefit.com

  • http://www.healthwellnesstips.net/ health_wellness_tips

    This is so interested! Where can I find more like this?

  • Pingback: Why Price Controls Will Make Healthcare Worse - Better Health

  • http://www.finalhealthinsurance.com/ultrasonic-liposuction/liposuction-financing.html liposuction financing

    In spite the odds, health care is very important. It’s one consolation for life’s hard work especially to the lowly workers.

  • http://www.grouphealthlead.com/ hinsuranceleads

    Now a days most of the people are worried about their health and health insurance is one of the best for the people.I think it also help people for free of tension which is the a major reason health down….Thanks for the nice post and keep up blogging…

  • http://www.grouphealthlead.com/ hinsuranceleads

    Now a days most of the people are worried about their health and health insurance is one of the best for the people.I think it also help people for free of tension which is the a major reason health down….Thanks for the nice post and keep up blogging…

  • http://medicalbilling4u.com Dee Ann

    Though I am a medical insurance billing employee, I can say that the price of health insurance is getting higher and higher, and yet, the coverage is still small. It really is uneconomical to other Americans. The things I see in my work in medical billing service shows that some are being uncompetitive, and change is needed.

  • http://www.nyhealthinsurer.com Vista Health

    The best option to get a better health insurance deal is to only get the type of health insurance that you need.

    Thank you for sharing this post.

  • http://www.nyhealthinsurer.com Health Insurance NY

    Health insurance is expensive because of the cost that is equated from the doctors, hospitals and prices going up on medical…

    I thank the blog owner for sharing this post.

  • http://www.bluemedica.com/radiesse.php radiesse

    It is simply about what you are willing to pay out of your own pocket as against what you want the insurance company to provide. Online insurance is rapidly taking over the world, replacing the old traditional measures which in the past seemed to be the right way for obtaining insurance.

  • http://www.thehealthyroadwarrior.com/services/road-warrior-wellness-coaching/ Wellness Coaching

    Well it is true that health insurance is just getting costlier by the day. No wonder the health and wellness programs are so much more popular as people are realizing the importance of a safer and healthier life.

  • Anonymous

    The implication of all this is that you can make health insurance really cheap if you (a) only sold it to healthy people and (b) made it cover very little. But what would be the point then?

  • http://www.seefirstblog.com Evan Falchuk

    Hi Nancy,

    Of course, no one would want to buy a policy like that!

    The trouble is that the insurance regulatory system in the United States is archaic and bad for consumers. We have 50 state regulators and each one sets its own rules as to the content of insurance policies.

    One of the promising things about the reform law is that the exchanges it sets up will have a national scope. Unfortunately, it seems as if the federal government is planning to regulate policies sold on the exchanges in the same way that the states do now. That’s not really progress.

    It’s ironic because you would think that America is the home of free market capitalism, but it’s not so in insurance. In other developed countries, like Canada, the government takes a different approach to insurance regulation that allows for far more innovation, competition and creativity.

    Evan

  • Anonymous

    No one WANTS to buy a policy like that, but lots of people DO because they don’t know any better. It happens all the time as I documented in an investigation I did for Consumer Reports: http://www.consumerreports.org/health/insurance/health-insurance/overview/health-insurance-ov.htm

    You are right about guarantee issue driving up the cost of insurance, but why didn’t you mention the inseparable corollary: that this is exactly why we have to have an individual mandate if we want health reform to work?

  • http://www.seefirstblog.com Evan Falchuk

    Good article, Nancy.

    Of course the kinds of mini-med policies you wrote about are approved by insurance regulators, whose job is supposed to be consumer protection. The system doesn’t work very well.

    You are correct — if you’re going to have guarantee issue, you also have to have an individual mandate. Otherwise the system doesn’t work.

    One can reasonably ask whether guarantee issue is the right solution to the problem in the first place….

    Evan

  • "Medicine is learned by the bedside and not in the class room. Let not your conception of manifestations of disease come from work heard in the lecture room or read from the book: see and then research, compare and control. But see first."
    - Sir William Osler, MD
    The Father of Modern Medicine
  • Connect



    BestDoctors.com


    On Twitter


    On Facebook


    Via RSS


    On YouTube


    Subscribe via Email

  • Benefits Package

    BenefitsPackageButton

    Join the best in employer health-benefits blogging!

  • Follow Us on YouTube:

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

  • Categories

  • Archives